Alanna
M. Schauer
Journal Entry 6: Knowledge
Discovery and Management
Keiser,
B. E. (2012). Quality patient education materials on the web. Online, 36(6).
The
article was chosen because it met many of the objectives of knowledge discovery
and their associated concepts. It discusses the application of knowledge to
create value which is the essential element of learning and the trends
associated with this learning. This was an excellent article of determining how
to obtain quality patient education and the author’s struggle to verify this
information.
This
article is an opinion culminated from an extensive search of internet resource
sites starting with Trust it or Trash it.
It is also a product review of many of consumer health sites like NetWellness
and MedTango. The author did their own systematic review and weeded out the non
credible websites. Then the author identified patient education materials and
the tools that were specific to an illness or subject matter that needs to be
taught.
The
need is that with millions of Americans searching the Internet for medical
information and health problem answers it is vital to have sites with proper
information that can be verified. An estimated eighty-six percent of adult
people use the internet for health information compared to 28-41%, who consults
with their primary health care providers, (Weber, Derrico, Yoon, &
Sherwill-Navarro, 2009). You could
propose that many internet users will accept web based health recommendations
instead of confiding in their primary physician. People can be embarrassed to admit they had
certain problems or ailments so they do research on their own and the quality
of the websites is questionable.
The
solution from this systematic review is the author created a comprehensive list
of consumer health sites with the explanation of their specific features that
make them credible. It is a reference guide to obtaining information that can
be very useful for patients and their families about numerous illness and
medical issues. A strategy for reviewing health sites and patient teaching
material was explained and promoted for standardization of patient education on
medical illness.
This
is important for healthcare delivery because patients are utilizing the
internet for many of their health questions and they do not always locate the
most credible resources. For medical professionals, this article listed many
health sites and reputable patient education resources and provided definitive
steps and strategies for keeping patient education material current and
maintaining best practice.
I
learned where to find credible resources for patient education material. The article provided a valuable list of
resources to utilize when patient ask for medical information sites.
It is also useful for nurses looking for information
on a health topic.
Reference
Weber, B., Derrico, D. J., Yoon, S. L., &
Sherwill-Navarro, P. (2010). Educating patients to
evaluate web-based
health care information: the GATOR approach to healthy surfing. Journal Of
Clinical Nursing, 19(9/10), 1371-1377. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02762.x
Hi Alanna,
ReplyDeleteDuring the Consumer Informatics class we had to evaluate a web site that contained health information and list criteria that we thought was important to the consumer. One issue that stands out in my mind is the usability of a web site. This includes how easy the site and the tools are to the user. Unfortunately, the target user may have limited levels of health literacy and lack computer experience. Keselman, Logan, Smith, Leroy, and Zeng-Treitler (2008), advocate optimizing information retrieval and text readability by using a 6th grade reading level. This issue has to be addressed during the creation of the Web site or tool, when the health information demand is developed with the need of the consumer in mind (Keselman et al., 2008). There are so many variables to look at! Great article!
Reference
Keselman, A., Logan, R., Smith, C., A., Leroy, G., Zeng-Treitler, Q. (2008), Developing informatics tools and strategies for consumer-centered health communication. JAMIA, 15(4), 473-483. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2442255/pdf/473.S1067502708000686.main.pdf
Credible sources is becoming easier now. The problem is that there are forums for people that are not credible to present their data of their own personal experiences that can be dangerous and prove disastrous for the desperate individuals searching for information. The free or the discount advice that is offered may prove detrimental in the long run because of the freedom we offer online.
ReplyDelete